Post Fordism, Post Modernism and Its Analyze Essay

Significance for Exploring the Organisation

[a] Content Fordism?

i) The 1980s: Flexible Specialisation and 'Disorganised Capitalism':

Piore and Sabel (1984) claim in The Second Industrial Divide[i] that new production devices must orientate towards multi-skilling and speedy re-skilling to be able to accommodate the search for shifting and recently forming specific niche market markets within a post mass production/mass customer world. This implies economies of scope rather than economies of scale and a more imaginative workforce, which, by inference is less alienated and more empowered than under Fordism.

The thing that was the ‘First' Industrial Separate?

Lash and Urry (1987) in The End of Organised Capitalism[ii] argue that there has been a tendency to get capitalism to get dis-organised for the reason that the old corporations of ordinaire bargaining and state-labour-employer human relationships are breaking. Pay willpower, and communautaire bargaining become fragmented and focussed on the enterprise rather than the state or perhaps sector. The decline of mass consumption/production is inter-linked with this process.

Fordism and Post Fordism

|Fordism |Post Fordism | |Mass creation |Small scale/batch production | |Standardised goods |Customized items | |Semi-/unskilled workers |Multi-skilled workers | |Fixed work descriptions |Flexible work jobs | |Moving assembly lines |Robots, computerization and work teams | |Large crops |Small-medium crops

Following Murray (1989)[iii]

ii) The 1990s: Lean Production

In a response to the ‘threat' by Japan Womack et al (1990) inside the Machine That Changed the World[iv] argue that effective and superb companies can simply thrive in the event that they adopt Japanese practices (‘Toyotaism') and eliminate waste by bringing out lean development methods.

The guidelines of trim production

just-in-time production

multi-skilled workers

on-the-job worker participation

zero flaws

high intensity hard work

simplified item designs

job security

after Womack ou al 1990

There is much debate as to whether

• Workers are ‘working harder or smarter' under lean development • Slim production is, or is not, action of Taylorism by additional means.


Berggren (1989)[v], for example , argues that LP is known as a hybrid scenario whereby the goals of Taylorism stay whilst extra strategies happen to be introduced which in turn strip staff of their ideas (flexible Taylorism).

Parker and Slaughter (1988)[vi] argued that the intensification of Taylorism was taking place underneath LP. In the case of the US/Japanese auto business, NUMMI, group working and LP had been introduced. Management claim that Taylorism is rejected as workers' knowledge is employed and accepted to improve the availability process. Parker and Slaughter (in contrast) suggest that precisely what is occurring is usually management simply by stress (MBS) as improvements to effectiveness must be constantly sought and implemented. Workers then wrap up working to common patterns, similar to Fordism.

Milkman (1997)[vii] shows that some (American) workers welcome the opportunity to recommend improvements, especially as the choice may be a non-unionised, oppressive and severe work plan. Keen workers are also provided the opportunity to shine.

But can it be the case that most production operations are now Post Fordist and Post Taylorist?

[b]HRM inside the Organisation

Human resource management techniques include...

History of Recreation Essay